I never thought I'd find myself writing a letter to City Council. I rarely get that worked up about things and I'd be more likely try to find other solutions to whatever the issue happens to be. When it comes to things like increased city taxes, I have the means to pay more and I don't want services cut. I want beautiful places like River Landing, a new art gallery, better cycling infrastructure, a children's museum and updated play area for kids. To get all these things costs money. Simple as that.
I'm also extremely cognizant of the fact that whatever I do in my personal life has the potential to impact on my work and on my employer -- whether that be positive or negative. Especially when much of my work these days involves interaction with our elected officials. It would be easy for them to think my personal thoughts are also those of the Police Service.
In September, a review was occurring and councillors were debating the merits of various City services. Up for discussion was increasing the cost of the seniors & low income bus pass. Normally, I probably wouldn't have voiced an opinion either way. But at this same time, I was busy working my way through the challenges of the
Saskatoon Food Basket Challenge and I felt compelled to share my experience in learning of the value of a $5 bill.
Although I did get some very positive responses from a few of the councilors, in the end my letter didn't have much effect. In last week's final budget deliberations they voted to increase the cost of the pass from $21 to $25 per month.
For interest's sake, here's my letter dated September 26.
I’m writing this
letter as Shelley Ballard-McKinlay. Not as Inspector Shelley Ballard. These are
my own words, thoughts, feelings and are in no way meant to represent the
Saskatoon Police Service.
From September
13-19, I was one of 13 participants in the Food Basket Challenge. Our challenge
was to live off the contents of a food basket from the Saskatoon Food Bank for
one week. The basket typically consists of 2-3 days worth of food, but many
clients make it last much longer than that. Clients can only go to the Food
Bank once every two weeks.
We were also
allowed the use of only five pantry items (out of a choice of 12 items such as
flour, coffee, tea, sugar, ketchup, mustard, etc.) and could spend only an
additional $5 on food. Accepting food from family or friends was not allowed.
Our limited
options and nearly complete lack of choice was very, very difficult for all of
us. For myself, this lack of choice manifested itself in a total obsession with
food both during the week and for at least a week or more prior to the
Challenge. I religiously rationed my food and thought long and hard about what
I was going to spend my $5 on, calculating the costs of items down to the
penny. I purchased a ½ dozen eggs and 1L of milk for $3.41 and then carefully
hoarded my remaining change to buy one
peach at the Farmer’s Market for $1.22. (Considering myself quite privileged, I
would normally not even think twice about how I spend $5 or $10 or $20+
dollars. Some of us admitted that we didn’t have a clue how much a piece of
fruit costs – we just go and buy it!)
As participants,
we were struggling to complete the Challenge. Many people felt too tired to
work properly. Some were unable to complete the Challenge. People with families
found it particularly difficult. And yet, we were the lucky ones. We had jobs
and warm houses and transportation. Once the Challenge was over, we could
restock our refrigerators, eat out in restaurants and enjoy the full range of
food options.
People who live in
poverty 365 days of the year are not so fortunate. Some of them responded to
the participant’s blog posts on the Food Basket Challenge website (www.foodbasketchallenge.com), telling about their experiences and feelings, and
it made me very aware of how difficult it is to cope on an extremely limited
budget because you have no choices.
Do you feed your
children or yourself? Do you buy medicine using the money you have budgeted for
food? Do you buy a bus pass or pay the telephone bill? These are not valid
choices – they’re desperate measures.
Here are just a
few other things I learned during the Challenge week:
- 44% of low-income households include at
least 1 working adult;
- Full-time minimum wage pays almost $16,000 below the poverty line for a family of
four;
- Social assistance doesn’t cover the cost of
affordable housing. The 2010 Saskatoon rental allowance was $625 for a family
of four, yet the average rent for a 2 bedroom apartment is $934;
- Social assistance provides $255 per month
to cover food, clothing, travel, personal and household items for an adult. The
amount is the same for a single
parent and one child!
Given the above
information I know, better than ever before, that it would be an extreme
hardship for low-income individuals and families to have to spend another $5
per month, per person, on transit.
You all have a
choice to make in the coming months. I emphasize it is a CHOICE. This is
something that my fellow Challengers and I did not have from September 13-19.
And something that low income people don’t have each and every day.
I ask that you
choose to keep the low-income subsidy for transit users. It is one small item
in a very large budget, but it will make an enormous difference to individuals
and families living in poverty and struggling to survive.
Respectfully
submitted,
Shelley
Ballard-McKinlay
